Skip to content

Type Quote by Stephen Coles

“Bell Centennial’s bizarre “4” and “M” are a perfect lesson in type made specifically for its intended medium. In this case, the platform was telephone books. In 1974, AT&T asked Matthew Carter to replace their previous typeface, Bell Gothic, with something that could save costs by fitting more…” quote by Stephen Coles
Download Open image
““Bell Centennial’s bizarre “4” and “M” are a perfect lesson in type made specifically for its intended medium. In this case, the platform was telephone books. In 1974, AT&T asked Matthew Carter to replace their previous typeface, Bell Gothic, with something that could save costs by fitting more lines per page. To keep the type legible at tiny sizes on cheap paper, Carter made extensive use of a compensation technique called “ink trapping.” This reduces the amount of ink-spread that distorts letters by filling junctions and counters. So, what looks strange, even ugly, at large sizes, actually takes its proper form on the pulpy pages of a directory. Many capitalize on Bell Centennial’s curiosity to set eye-catching””

Stephen Coles

About This Quote

Source Article: “The Story of Bell Centennial” by Stephen Coles, 2022

Bell Centennial was designed for telephone directories, using ink trapping to stay legible at tiny sizes, even if it looks odd at larger scales.

In simple terms: A typeface can be ugly big but perfect small due to its intended use.

Key Takeaway

Design for context, not just aesthetics.

Themes

design typography functionality context legibility

Mood

analytical pragmatic

Type

informative technical

When to use this quote

  • telephone directories
  • small print
  • branding
  • graphic design
  • printing

Key Concepts

ink trapping type adaptation medium specificity

Questions to Reflect On

  • How does medium dictate design decisions?
  • When is it acceptable to prioritize function over form?
A Different Perspective

May sacrifice visual appeal at larger sizes for optimal performance in its specific medium.

3.1 out of 5 (4 ratings)

More by Stephen Coles

Explore all 33 Stephen Coles quotes

More Type quotes

Browse all 4,861 Type quotes