Skip to content

Baseball Quote by Jeffrey Pfeffer

“Between 1999 and 2002, the Yankees paid over three times what the A’s paid for the average player on their roster. The Yankee payroll was $130 million in 2002; that of the A’s, just $40 million. Yet the difference in performance between the two teams was surprisingly small considering the vast…” quote by Jeffrey Pfeffer
Download Open image
““Between 1999 and 2002, the Yankees paid over three times what the A’s paid for the average player on their roster. The Yankee payroll was $130 million in 2002; that of the A’s, just $40 million. Yet the difference in performance between the two teams was surprisingly small considering the vast difference in salaries. The Yankees made the championship playoffs in 2000, 2001, and 2002, but so did the A’s. The Yankees did go all the way to the World Series in 2000 and 2001, and won it in 2000. But during the 2002 regular season, the A’s and the Yankees each won 103 games. Just think what the A’s might have accomplished with the combination of evidence and unlimited budget.””

Jeffrey Pfeffer

About This Quote

Source Article: Harvard Business Review, 2003

Shows that high payroll does not guarantee superior performance, suggesting diminishing returns.

In simple terms: Big spending doesn’t always win.

Key Takeaway

Evaluate efficiency over expense.

Themes

economics performance efficiency

Mood

analytical critical

Type

informative analytical

When to use this quote

  • team budgeting
  • salary negotiations
  • performance metrics

Key Concepts

resource allocation diminishing returns

Questions to Reflect On

  • How to measure true value?
  • What limits spending impact?
A Different Perspective

Contextual factors like talent matter.

3.4 out of 5 (3 ratings)

More by Jeffrey Pfeffer

Explore all 78 Jeffrey Pfeffer quotes

More Baseball quotes

Browse all 7,461 Baseball quotes