America Quote by Robert H. Jackson
““Struggles to coerce uniformity of sentiment in support of some end thought essential to their time and country have been waged by many good as well as by evil men. Nationalism is a relatively recent phenomenon but at other times and places the ends have been racial or territorial security, support of a dynasty or regime, and particular plans for saving souls. As first and moderate methods to attain unity have failed, those bent on its accomplishment must resort to an ever-increasing severity. . . . Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard. It seems trite but necessary to say that the First Amendment to our Constitution was designed to avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings. There is no mysticism in the American concept of the State or of the nature or origin of its authority. We set up government by consent of the governed, and the Bill of Rights denies those in power any legal opportunity to coerce that consent. Authority here is to be controlled by public opinion, not public opinion by authority. If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.””
About This Quote
Source Speech: Remarks on the First Amendment, United States Supreme Court, 1945
The quote warns that forcing uniform opinion leads to oppression and violence, and that constitutional protections of free speech prevent such tyranny.
In simple terms: Forcing agreement kills dissent; free speech protects liberty.
Guard free speech and resist coercion.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- legislative debates
- court rulings
- public protests
- media regulation
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How can societies balance security and free expression?
- When does dissent become harmful?
Coercion may be justified in emergencies, challenging absolute free speech.