Skip to content

Communication Quote by James McGrath Morris

“Berkman called no witnesses of his own. Instead, with the aid of an ill-trained interpreter, he began to read his long speech. “Some may wonder why I have declined a legal defense,” Berkman said. “My reasons are twofold. In the first place, I am an anarchist: I do not believe in man-made laws…” quote by James McGrath Morris
Download Open image
““Berkman called no witnesses of his own. Instead, with the aid of an ill-trained interpreter, he began to read his long speech. “Some may wonder why I have declined a legal defense,” Berkman said. “My reasons are twofold. In the first place, I am an anarchist: I do not believe in man-made laws, designed to enslave and oppress humanity. Secondly, an extraordinary phenomenon like an attentat cannot be measured by the narrow standards of legality.” In short, Berkman said, he would explain the deed, and by doing so, society itself would be put on trial. An hour into his presentation, much of which was heard only in mangled English, Judge McClung’s patience came to an end. He ordered Berkman to finish by the rapidly approaching hour of one o’clock. “I can have all the time I want for my defense and will take all the time I need,” Berkman replied. “No, you haven’t,” said the judge. “We’ll teach you different if you think you can dictate to us.” Berkman and his interpreter sputtered on. At 1:10 the judge stopped Berkman and gave the prosecutor the floor. Holding the dagger in his hands, he urged the jury to convict Berkman. The jury didn’t even stir from the box. It immediately pronounced Berkman guilty on all counts. McClung sentenced him to 22 years of confinement.””

James McGrath Morris

About This Quote

Source Book: The Man Who Knew Too Much by James McGrath Morris, 2009

Berkman rejects legal defense, arguing that an anarchist’s act challenges societal laws and forces a broader moral trial.

In simple terms: He refuses to defend himself within the legal system, seeking a societal reckoning.

Key Takeaway

Challenge authority, demand moral scrutiny.

Themes

law anarchism justice civil disobedience

Mood

defiant critical

Type

philosophical historical

When to use this quote

  • courtroom
  • political protest
  • public trial
  • media coverage

Key Concepts

political philosophy ethical critique

Questions to Reflect On

  • Can law ever truly judge moral transgressions?
  • What alternatives exist for confronting unjust laws?
A Different Perspective

Legal systems may not accommodate radical dissent.

3.8 out of 5 (3 ratings)

More by James McGrath Morris

Explore all 21 James McGrath Morris quotes

More Communication quotes

Browse all 21,506 Communication quotes