Skip to content

Art Quote by Christopher Hitchens

“Design must be proved before a designer can be inferred. The matter in controversy is the existence of design in the Universe, and it is not permitted to assume the contested premises and thence infer the matter in dispute. Insidiously to employ the words contrivance, design, and adaptation before…” quote by Christopher Hitchens
Download Open image
““Design must be proved before a designer can be inferred. The matter in controversy is the existence of design in the Universe, and it is not permitted to assume the contested premises and thence infer the matter in dispute. Insidiously to employ the words contrivance, design, and adaptation before these circumstances are made apparent in the Universe, thence justly inferring a contriver is a popular sophism against which it behooves us to be watchful. To assert that motion is an attribute of mind, that matter is inert, that every combination is the result of intelligence is also an assumption of the matter in dispute. Why do we admit design in any machine of human contrivance? Simply, because innumerable instances of machines having been contrived by human art are present to our mind, because we are acquainted with persons who could construct such machines; but if, having no previous knowledge of any artificial contrivance, we had accidentally found a watch upon the ground, we should have been justified in concluding that it was a thing of Nature, that it was a combination of matter with whose cause we were unacquainted, and that any attempt to account for the origin of its existence would be equally presumptuous and unsatisfactory. The analogy, which you attempt to establish between the contrivances of human art and the various existences of the Universe, is inadmissible. We attribute these effects to human intelligence, because we know before hand that human intelligence is capable of producing them. Take away this knowledge, and the grounds of our reasoning will be destroyed. Our entire ignorance, therefore, of the Divine Nature leaves this analogy defective in its most essential point of comparison.””

Christopher Hitchens

About This Quote

Source Essay: “The God Delusion” (Chapter 3), 2006

The argument claims we cannot infer universal design from human-made artifacts because the reasoning relies on assuming design exists, which is a circular premise.

In simple terms: We should not assume design in nature just because we see it in human creations.

Key Takeaway

Question assumptions about design before concluding its existence.

Themes

philosophy logic science theology critical thinking

Mood

skeptical analytical inquisitive

Type

philosophical critical debate

When to use this quote

  • debates on cosmology
  • evaluating intelligent design
  • educational lectures
  • science classrooms
  • philosophical discussions

Key Concepts

circular reasoning analogy epistemology design argument

Questions to Reflect On

  • What evidence would convince you that design exists independently of human artifacts?
  • How do we differentiate between apparent design and emergent complexity?
A Different Perspective

The argument may overlook evidence of natural patterns that arise without intelligent agency.

2.6 out of 5 (3 ratings)

More by Christopher Hitchens

Explore all 1,241 Christopher Hitchens quotes

More Art quotes

Browse all 48,652 Art quotes