Criticisms Quote by Thomas Nagel
““In thinking about these questions I have been stimulated by criticisms of the prevailing scientific world picture... by the defenders of intelligent design. Even though writers like Michael Behe and Stephen C. Meyer are motivated at least in part by their religious beliefs, the empirical arguments they offer against the likelihood that the origin of life and its evolutionary history can be fully explained by physics and chemistry are of great interest in themselves. Another skeptic, David Berlinski , has brought out these problems vividly without reference to the design inference. Even if one is not drawn to the alternative of an explanation by the actions of a designer, the problems that these iconoclasts pose for the orthodox scientific consensus should be taken seriously. They do not deserve the scorn with which they are commonly met. It is manifestly unfair.””
About This Quote
Source Essay: “The View from Nowhere”, 1986
Critics of mainstream science, even those with religious motives, raise valuable empirical challenges to explanations of life's origins, meriting serious consideration.
In simple terms: Even opposing views can highlight gaps in scientific explanations.
Take scientific critiques seriously, regardless of source.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- academic debate
- policy making
- education curriculum
- public discourse
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- What empirical evidence challenges current models?
- How can science address these gaps?
Some critiques may be driven by bias, not evidence.