Evolution Quote by Thomas Nagel
““The denier that ID [intelligent design] is science faces the following dilemma. Either he admits that the intervention of such a designer is possible, or he does not. If he does not, he must explain why that belief is more scientific than the belief that a designer is possible. If on the other hand he believes that a designer is possible, then he can argue that the evidence is overwhelmingly against the actions of such a designer, but he cannot say that someone who offers evidence on the other side is doing something of a fundamentally different kind. All he can say about that person is that he is scientifically mistaken.””
About This Quote
Source Speech: Public debate on intelligent design, 1990s
The quote argues that denying intelligent design as science forces a logical dilemma about the possibility and evidence of a designer, labeling opposing views as scientifically mistaken.
In simple terms: Denying intelligent design creates a logical dilemma about its possibility and evidence.
Recognize the logical inconsistency and evaluate evidence objectively.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- academic discussions
- policy making
- education curriculum
- public lectures
- media analysis
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How does one assess the scientific merit of non‑material explanations?
- What criteria define a claim as scientific?
The argument may oversimplify complex scientific and philosophical positions.