Management Quote by Anonymous
““Two opinion pieces written by local author Catherine Lim in The Straits Times in 1994 were good examples of the political climate in the early years of Goh’s administration. The first article was titled “The PAP and the People: A Great Affective Divide.” Her thesis was that while the people of Singapore recognized the effective job the party did in running Singapore and providing for its prosperity, many of them did not like their leaders very much. For instance, on National Day, many Singaporeans did not fly the national flag because of the close connection between it and the PAP. Somehow flying the flag indicated you were a PAP supporter or liked the party, which in many minds was different from respecting what the leaders had done. In her second article, Lim questioned whether any significant political change had taken place with the handover of power from Lee Kuan Yew to Goh Chok Tong. She argued that the large salary increase for government officials that had been approved was an example of the continuing top-down style of government. In a way, the government’s response to these articles proved her correct. Its immediate reaction was to state that local writers had no business being involved in political issues. If they wanted to do so, they should join a political party and not give opinions from the sidelines. The argument was the same one used almost a decade earlier against the law society and against the churches. While there had been an attempt to obtain more feedback from people, there was still a deep feeling among PAP leaders that public political debate must be limited. Even in the mid-1990s, there was still a belief that too broad a discourse would threaten Singapore’s success.””
About This Quote
Catherine Lim's 1994 columns highlighted a disconnect between Singaporeans' appreciation of the PAP's governance and their personal dislike of its leaders, and questioned whether the transition from Lee Kuan Yew to Goh Chok Tong brought substantive political reform.
In simple terms: Public support for policies can coexist with personal opposition to leaders.
Political legitimacy may rest on performance, not affection.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- Analyzing voter behavior in semi‑authoritarian regimes
- Assessing media freedom after leadership changes
- Studying symbolic acts (e.g., flag‑flying) as political signals
Key Concepts
Practical Applications
- Policy‑impact research on public opinion
- Media‑rights advocacy
Questions to Reflect On
- How does performance‑based legitimacy affect long‑term political stability?
- What mechanisms can reconcile symbolic dissent with national unity?
Some argue that limiting debate preserves social cohesion and economic success, but this can also stifle accountability and innovation.