Skip to content

Happiness Quote by Stephen R.C. Hicks

“The implication is that logical or mathematical proofs cuts no ice in adjudicating competing claims of fact.[101] Analytic propositions “are entirely devoid of factual content. And it is for this reason that no experience can confute them.”[102] Offering logical proofs about real matters of fact…” quote by Stephen R.C. Hicks
Download Open image
““The implication is that logical or mathematical proofs cuts no ice in adjudicating competing claims of fact.[101] Analytic propositions “are entirely devoid of factual content. And it is for this reason that no experience can confute them.”[102] Offering logical proofs about real matters of fact is thus pointless. And, conversely, it is pointless to expect any amount of factual evidence to add up to a necessary or universal conclusion.””

Stephen R.C. Hicks

About This Quote

Source Book: The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy of Religion, 2000

Logical proofs lack factual content and cannot resolve real-world disputes; evidence alone cannot guarantee universal conclusions.

In simple terms: Proofs don’t settle factual debates; evidence isn’t absolute.

Key Takeaway

Rely on pragmatic reasoning and contextual evidence.

Themes

logic epistemology law philosophy

Mood

critical analytical

Type

philosophical argumentative

When to use this quote

  • court cases
  • policy making
  • scientific research
  • everyday decision making

Key Concepts

analytic propositions factual content evidence limits

Questions to Reflect On

  • Can logical reasoning ever fully replace empirical evidence?
  • When should we prioritize facts over formal logic?
A Different Perspective

Logical proof may be persuasive but not decisive without empirical support.

2.6 out of 5 (7 ratings)

More by Stephen R.C. Hicks

Explore all 53 Stephen R.C. Hicks quotes

More Happiness quotes

Browse all 39,040 Happiness quotes