Bandits Quote by Louis-Ferdinand Céline
““We have got into the habit of admiring colossal bandits, whose opulence is revered by the entire world, yet whose existence, once we stop to examine it, proves to be one long crime repeated ad infinitum, but those same bandits are heaped with glory, honors, and power, their crimes are hallowed by the law of the land, whereas, as far back in history as the eye can see—and history, as you know is my business—everything conspires to show that a venial theft, especially of inglorious foodstuffs, such as bread crusts, ham, or cheese, unfailingly subjects its perpetrator to irreparable opprobrium, the categoric condemnation of the community, major punishment, automatic dishonor, and inexpiable shame, and this for two reasons, first because the perpetrator of such an offense is usually poor, which in itself connotes basic unworthiness, and secondly because his act implies, as it were, a tacit reproach to the community. A poor man’s theft is seen as a malicious attempt at individual redress . . . Where would we be? Note accordingly that in all countries the penalties for petty theft are extremely severe, not only as a means of defending society, but also as a stern admonition to the unfortunate to know their place, stick to their caste, and behave themselves, joyfully resigned to go on dying of hunger and misery down through the centuries forever and ever …””
About This Quote
Source Novel: Journey to the End of the Night, Louis-Ferdinand Céline, 1932
The passage critiques how societies glorify powerful yet criminal elites while harshly punishing petty theft, especially by the poor, revealing systemic injustice
In simple terms: Society rewards the rich and punishes the poor unfairly
Recognize and challenge double standards in justice
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- Criminal justice reform
- poverty advocacy
- media analysis
- public policy debate
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- What examples of double standards have you observed?
- How can societies balance law and compassion?
The view may oversimplify complex historical contexts and ignore nuances of law enforcement