Tibet Intention Quote by Karl Brunnholzl
““Pawo Rinpoche comments that, in Tibet, the intention of the lineage of profound view is usually explained as self-emptiness, that is, as a nonimplicative negation in which nothing whatsoever exists as a remainder after analysis through reasoning. The intention of the lineage of vast activity is explained as the other-empty ultimate that exists as a permanent and lasting remainder after such analysis. By clinging to one of these views as being the true meaning, the respective other one is then presented as a view of either permanence or extinction. However, these one-sided options, such as existence, nonexistence, permanence, and extinction, are neither the ultimate of the lineage of profound view nor the ultimate of the lineage of vast activity.””
About This Quote
The passage explains that Tibetan Buddhist teachings distinguish between two ultimate perspectives: emptiness (no inherent existence) and other‑emptiness (a lasting, inherent reality). Neither extreme—pure existence nor absolute non‑existence—captures the true nature of reality; both are partial views.
In simple terms: Avoiding extremes of existence and non‑existence.
Both emptiness and other‑emptiness are provisional lenses.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- scholarly study of Tibetan Buddhism
- meditation on ultimate nature
- comparative philosophy
- teaching workshops
Key Concepts
Practical Applications
- academic analysis of Buddhist metaphysics
- guiding meditation practice
Questions to Reflect On
- How does recognizing both views affect one's practice?
- What is the risk of clinging to a single ultimate view?