Bigs Quote by Joseph L. Bast
“How could two teams of scientists come to such obviously contradictory conclusions on seemingly every point that matters in the debate over global warming? There are many reasons why scientists disagree, the subject, by the way, of an excellent book a couple years ago titled Wrong by David H. Freedman. A big reason is IPCC is producing what academics call "post-normal science" while NIPCC is producing old-fashioned "real science.”
About This Quote
Source Book: Wrong, David H. Freedman, 2005
Scientists reach opposite conclusions on climate because they use different methods and assumptions, highlighting scientific debate.
In simple terms: Scientists disagree on climate due to differing approaches.
Key Takeaway
Recognize methodological diversity.
Themes
science
climate change
debate
Mood
critical
inquisitive
Type
academic
analytical
When to use this quote
- policy making
- public discourse
- research funding
Key Concepts
post‑normal science
real science
bias
Questions to Reflect On
- How can we bridge scientific disagreements?
- What role should policy play in contested science?
A Different Perspective
Complex issues may be oversimplified by binary framing.
![“The typical white intellectual considers himself superior to ordinary white people for two contradictory reasons: a] he constantly proclaims belief in human equality, but they don't; b] he has a high IQ, but they don't.” quote by Steve Sailer](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/850/steve-sailer-33384_belief_the-typical-white-intellectual-considers_81076.jpg)
![“The only regret I have in my career, is my managers wanted a big payday, and I wanted four or five more fights before going in with [Larry] Holmes. That would have made all the difference.” quote by Gerry Cooney](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/d63/gerry-cooney-20863_bigs_the-only-regret-i-have-in-my-career-is-m_1534.jpg)
