Skip to content

We may say then that the contribution of the telegraph to…

“We may say then that the contribution of the telegraph to public discourse was to dignify irrelevance and amplify impotence. But this was not all: Telegraphy also made public discourse essentially incoherent. It brought into being a world of broken time and broken attention, to use Lewis Mumford's…” quote by Neil Postman
Download Open image
““We may say then that the contribution of the telegraph to public discourse was to dignify irrelevance and amplify impotence. But this was not all: Telegraphy also made public discourse essentially incoherent. It brought into being a world of broken time and broken attention, to use Lewis Mumford's phrase. The principle strength of the telegraph was its capacity to move information, not collect it, explain it or analyze it. In this respect, telegraphy was the exact opposite of typography.””

Neil Postman

About This Quote

This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.

The telegraph prioritized rapid transmission over thoughtful analysis, making public conversation fragmented and shallow.

In simple terms: Fast messages hurt deep thinking.

Key Takeaway

Prioritize depth over speed.

Themes

communication media attention analysis fragmentation

Mood

critical reflective

Type

analytical media critique

When to use this quote

  • newsrooms
  • social media
  • education
  • political debate

Key Concepts

information overload media theory cognitive impact

Questions to Reflect On

  • How does rapid communication affect critical thinking?
  • What can restore coherence in public discourse?
A Different Perspective

Speed can undermine understanding and nuance.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ No ratings yet

More by Neil Postman

Explore all 220 Neil Postman quotes

More Communication quotes

Browse all 21,506 Communication quotes