Buddhism Quote by Kaiten Nukariya
““Confucius, Lao Tsz, and Shakya, however, were all the wisest of sages. Each of them gave his teachings in a way different from the other two, that they might meet the spiritual needs of his time and fit to the capacities of men. (So that) the Buddhist and the outside doctrines, each supplementing the other, have done good to the multitude. They were all (intended) to encourage thousands of virtuous acts by explaining the whole chain of causality. They were (also intended) to investigate thousands of things, and throw light on the beginning and on the end of their evolution. Although all these doctrines (might) answer the purpose of the sages, yet there must be some teachings that would be temporary,[FN#290] while others would be eternal. The first two faiths are merely temporary, while Buddhism includes both the temporary and the eternal. We may act according to the precepts of these three faiths, which aim at the peace and welfare (of man), in so far as they encourage thousands of virtuous acts by giving warning against evil and recommending good. (But) Buddhism (alone) is altogether perfect and best of all, in investigating thousands of things and in tracing them back to their first cause, in order to acquire thorough understanding of the natures of things and to attain to the ultimate truth. [FN#290]””
About This Quote
The passage compares three sages and their teachings, noting that while each addresses the needs of their era, Buddhism uniquely combines temporary and eternal insights, aiming for deep understanding and ultimate truth.
In simple terms: Three sages taught differently; Buddhism blends temporary and eternal lessons for deeper truth.
Recognize Buddhism’s comprehensive approach to truth.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- religious study
- personal meditation
- ethical decision making
- academic comparison
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How do you balance temporary practices with seeking eternal truths?
- What makes a teaching “perfect”?
Buddhism’s claim of being “perfect” may be contested by other traditions.