Bases Quote by Christina Hoff Sommers
“We reject creationism because there is no evidence to support it. By contrast, the notion that biology is at least partially the basis of gender is an empirically supportable, and even well-supported, proposition. The gender scholars reject it on ideological, not evidentiary, grounds.”
About This Quote
Source Article: The New York Times, “The Gender Debate”, 2020
The quote argues that creationism lacks empirical support while biological explanations of gender are evidence‑based, and claims gender scholars reject the latter for ideological reasons.
In simple terms: Creationism isn’t evidence‑based; biology of gender is.
Key Takeaway
Question evidence, avoid ideology.
Themes
science
evidence
gender
ideology
bias
Mood
critical
analytical
Type
argumentative
controversial
When to use this quote
- academic debate
- policy making
- education curriculum
- public discourse
Key Concepts
empiricism
social constructivism
Questions to Reflect On
- How do we balance scientific evidence with social perspectives?
- What evidence supports biological influences on gender?
A Different Perspective
The claim may oversimplify complex scientific and social discussions.
![“I call [fourth-wave feminism] fainting–couch feminism, a la the delicate Victorian ladies who retreated to an elegant chaise when overcome with emotion. As an equality feminist from the 1970s, I am dismayed by this new craze. Women are not children. We are not fragile little birds who can’t cope…” quote by Christina Hoff Sommers](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/fb5/christina-hoff-sommers-18174_feminism_i-call-fourth-wave-feminism-fainting-cou_1176569.jpg)
