Book of revelation Quote by Bart D. Ehrman
““In some parts of the church, the Apocalypse of John (the book of Revelation) was flat out rejected as containing false teaching, whereas the Apocalypse of Peter, which eventually did not make it in, was accepted. There were some Christians who accepted the Gospel of Peter and some who rejected the Gospel of John. There were some Christians who accepted a truncated version of the Gospel of Luke (without its first two chapters), and others who accepted the now noncanonical Gospel of Thomas. Some Christians rejected the three Pastoral Epistles of 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus, which eventually made it in, and others accepted the Epistle of Barnabas, which did not.””
About This Quote
Source Book: Forgery and Counterfeit: The Use of Literary Deception in Early Christianity, 2012
Early Christian communities varied widely in which texts they deemed authoritative, leading to differing can canon formation.
In simple terms: Christians disagreed on which books were true.
Key Takeaway
Recognize that religious can are historically contested.
Themes
canon formation
authority
scripture
early Christianity
Mood
scholarly
critical
reflective
Type
historical
theological
explanatory
When to use this quote
- church councils
- seminary curricula
- personal study of apocryphal works
Key Concepts
Textual criticism
historical criticism
canonical process
Questions to Reflect On
- How did power dynamics shape which books were included?
- What criteria should modern readers use to assess ancient texts?
A Different Perspective
Canonical decisions were influenced by politics and theology, not just textual merit.
![“...[T]oday's Washington is about as attentive to the Tenth Amendment as the Unitarian Church is to the Book of Revelation.” quote by Joseph Sobran](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/b72/joseph-sobran-6902_amendments_t-oday-s-washington-is-about-as-attentiv_404524.jpg)
