Being nearly four years old, she was certainly a child…
““Being nearly four years old, she was certainly a child: and children are human (if one allows the term "human" a wide sense): but she had not altogether ceased to be a baby: and babies are of course not human--they are animals, and have a very ancient and ramified culture, as cats have, and fishes, and even snakes: the same in kind as these, but much more complicated and vivid, since babies are, after all, one of the most developed species of the lower vertebrates. In short, babies have minds which work in terms and categories of their own which cannot be translated into the terms and categories of the human mind. It is true that they look human--but not so human, to be quite fair, as many monkeys. Subconsciously, too, every one recognizes they are animals--why else do people always laugh when a baby does some action resembling the human, as they would at a praying mantis? If the baby was only a less-developed man, there would be nothing funny in it, surely.””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
The passage argues that babies, while appearing human, operate with a fundamentally different, animal-like cognition that is not directly translatable to adult human thought.
In simple terms: Babies think in their own animal-like way, not like adults.
Recognize and respect the distinct mental world of infants.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- parenting
- early education
- cross‑cultural child studies
- psychology research
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How does recognizing babies' unique cognition change caregiving?
- What are the limits of comparing infants to animals?
The view may oversimplify infant cognition and ignore continuity with adult mental capacities.