There could conceivably be circumstances in which an…
![“There could conceivably be circumstances in which an experiment on an animal stands to reduce suffering so much that it would be permissible to carry it out even if it involved harm to the animal... [even if] the animal were a human being.” quote by Peter Singer](https://sms4smile.com/q/img-quotes/bf7/peter-singer-1001_animal_there-could-conceivably-be-circumstances_307252.jpg)
“There could conceivably be circumstances in which an experiment on an animal stands to reduce suffering so much that it would be permissible to carry it out even if it involved harm to the animal... [even if] the animal were a human being.”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
When animal testing could vastly reduce suffering, it may be morally permissible despite causing harm, even if the animal were human.
In simple terms: Extreme animal testing may be allowed if it prevents greater suffering.
Key Takeaway
Weigh overall suffering reduction against immediate harm.
Themes
ethics
animal welfare
utilitarianism
Mood
thoughtful
serious
Type
ethical
philosophical
When to use this quote
- medical research
- policy making
- animal rights activism
Key Concepts
moral calculus
speciesism
consequentialism
Questions to Reflect On
- Is it ever justified to harm an individual for greater overall good?
- How do we define “suffering” across species?
A Different Perspective
Balancing harm and benefit is complex and controversial.