Neutrality in things good or evil is both odious and…
“Neutrality in things good or evil is both odious and prejudicial; but in matters of an indifferent nature is safe and commendable. Herein taking of parts maketh sides, and breaketh unity. In an unjust cause of separation, he that favoreth both parts may perhaps have least love of either side, but hath most charity in himself.”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Neutrality in moral matters can be harmful, while impartiality in trivial issues is safe.
In simple terms: Choosing sides matters in big issues.
Key Takeaway
Pick a side when stakes are high.
Themes
ethics
neutrality
politics
Mood
critical
thoughtful
Type
philosophical
ethical
When to use this quote
- political debates
- legal judgments
- community disputes
- media reporting
Key Concepts
philosophy
conflict resolution
history
Questions to Reflect On
- When should you stay neutral?
- What are the costs of taking a stand?
A Different Perspective
Being neutral may be seen as cowardice or indecisiveness.