Research has found that interviews are less predictive of…
““Research has found that interviews are less predictive of job performance than work samples, job-knowledge tests, and peer ratings of past job performance. Even a simple intelligence test is substantially more predictive than an interview.””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Traditional interviews are weaker predictors of job success than practical tests and peer feedback.
In simple terms: Tests and peer reviews predict job performance better than interviews.
Key Takeaway
Prioritize work samples and peer ratings in hiring.
Themes
hiring
assessment
predictive validity
Mood
analytical
practical
Type
advisory
research‑based
When to use this quote
- job performance
- selection processes
Key Concepts
interviews
work samples
peer ratings
intelligence tests
Questions to Reflect On
- What balance of interview and test would you use?
- How can you measure cultural fit reliably?
A Different Perspective
Interviews can assess cultural fit, which tests may miss.