I don't believe in an eye for an eye. I believe in two…
“I don't believe in an eye for an eye. I believe in two eyes for an eye.”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Rejects simple revenge; advocates proportional response—two eyes for one eye.
In simple terms: Advocates balanced retaliation, not equal harm.
Key Takeaway
Practice measured justice over vengeance.
Themes
ethics
justice
revenge
Mood
thoughtful
serious
Type
philosophical
ethical
When to use this quote
- legal disputes
- personal grievances
- sports penalties
Key Concepts
proportionality
restorative justice
conflict resolution
Questions to Reflect On
- How can you apply proportionality in personal disputes?
- What alternatives exist to retaliation?
A Different Perspective
Balancing may be hard in intense conflict.