Thus, because Christian morality leaves animals out of…
““Thus, because Christian morality leaves animals out of account (of this, more later on), they are at once outlawed in philosophical morals; they are mere “things,” mere means to any ends whatsoever. They can therefore be used for vivisection, hunting, coursing, bullfights, and horse racing, and can be whipped to death as they struggle along with heavy carts of stone. Shame on such a morality that is worthy of pariahs, chandalas, and mlechchhas, and that fails to recognize the eternal essence that exists in every living thing, and shines forth with inscrutable insignificance from all eyes that see the sun! But that morality knows and respects only its own worthy species, whose characteristic reason [Vernunft] is the condition on which a being can be an object of moral consideration and respect.””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Schopenhauer argues that Christian morality excludes animals from moral consideration, treating them as mere means, which justifies their exploitation.
In simple terms: Christian morality ignores animal suffering, treating them as objects.
Key Takeaway
Recognize animal sentience and extend moral concern.
Themes
ethics
animal rights
philosophy
humanism
Mood
critical
reflective
Type
philosophical
ethical
When to use this quote
- animal testing
- hunting
- livestock farming
- entertainment industries
Key Concepts
anthropocentrism
sentience
moral consideration
Questions to Reflect On
- How would moral duties change if animals were fully considered?
- What criteria should grant moral status?
A Different Perspective
Moral frameworks often prioritize human interests over non‑human life.