Can do Quote by Richard Engel
![“How can you claim infallibility and claim that in these 114 [drone] strikes there was just one mistake -- one person killed that was a civilian -- and at the same time say, 'Well, we don't really know how many people were killed or who they were, but we know they weren't civilians'? I don't know…” quote by Richard Engel](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/1e0/richard-engel-3133_can-do_how-can-you-claim-infallibility-and-clai_2905561.jpg)
“How can you claim infallibility and claim that in these 114 [drone] strikes there was just one mistake -- one person killed that was a civilian -- and at the same time say, 'Well, we don't really know how many people were killed or who they were, but we know they weren't civilians'? I don't know how you can do that.”
About This Quote
Source Interview: CNN, 2023
The speaker questions contradictory statements about civilian casualties in drone strikes, highlighting logical inconsistency.
In simple terms: Contradictory claims about civilian deaths.
Key Takeaway
Demand consistent evidence and accountability.
Themes
ethics
military
accountability
Mood
critical
skeptical
Type
political
analytical
When to use this quote
- policy debate
- media analysis
- human rights advocacy
Key Concepts
logic
cognitive dissonance
Questions to Reflect On
- How can officials reconcile conflicting statements?
- What mechanisms ensure accurate reporting?
A Different Perspective
Such claims can undermine credibility and public trust.
![“There were between 46 and 52 drone strikes under the [George W.] Bush administration. And now there are over 400 - that's not counting Afghanistan. So this has been tremendously increased under the [Barack] Obama administration.” quote by Medea Benjamin](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/db9/medea-benjamin-27522_administration_there-were-between-46-and-52-drone-strik_1140265.jpg)
