Skip to content

Question Deuteronomy Quote by R. W. L. Moberly

“such a translation may beg the interpretive question. Deuteronomy has two other verbs to express a straightforward sense of “destroy.”57 Moreover, the conceptuality of ḥērem is on any reckoning more complex than “destroy,” even if in certain contexts destruction might be entailed. It appears that…” quote by R. W. L. Moberly
Download Open image
““such a translation may beg the interpretive question. Deuteronomy has two other verbs to express a straightforward sense of “destroy.”57 Moreover, the conceptuality of ḥērem is on any reckoning more complex than “destroy,” even if in certain contexts destruction might be entailed. It appears that the prime sense is a matter of making something the exclusive possession of YHWH and thereby removing it from the sphere of regular human use. Even though this could entail destruction, it is important to realize that “‘destruction’ is a secondary implication of ḥērem and not its primary meaning.”58 There is thus a case for translating the verbal form with “put under the ban,” or simply “ban,” not least because such a translation has the merit of being somewhat opaque and thus prevents the contemporary reader from too readily assuming that the meaning of the word is understood.””

R. W. L. Moberly

About This Quote

Source Book: The Bible (Deuteronomy) commentary by R. W. L. Moberly, 2000

The Hebrew term ḥērem primarily means to designate something as belonging exclusively to God, which may lead to destruction but is not defined by it.

In simple terms: ḥērem marks something as God’s exclusive property, not simply destroyed.

Key Takeaway

Recognize the nuance between divine ownership and destruction.

Themes

theology language interpretation ownership destruction

Mood

thoughtful analytical

Type

explanatory scholarly

When to use this quote

  • religious study
  • translation work
  • academic lecture
  • scriptural analysis

Key Concepts

Hebrew semantics biblical law exegesis

Questions to Reflect On

  • How does understanding ḥērem change our view of ancient law?
  • What modern concepts parallel exclusive divine ownership?
A Different Perspective

The term can be misread as purely destructive, overlooking its primary sense of exclusive dedication.

4.6 out of 5 (8 ratings)

More by R. W. L. Moberly

Explore all 10 R. W. L. Moberly quotes