Different Quote by Greg Koukl

There is not a single contemporary historical mention of Jesus, not by Romans or by Jews, not by believers or by unbelievers, during his…

— Dan Barker

Our reasons for believing Jesus existed and also that He was who He claimed to be - the God who came down - are…

— Greg Koukl

“If Jesus had been an actual historical figure we have a thorny paradox. Either this Jesus was a remarkable individual who said and did…

— David Fitzgerald

In the entire first Christian century Jesus is not mentioned by a single Greek or Roman historian, religion scholar, politician, philosopher or poet. His…

— Bart D. Ehrman

“There are no known non-biblical references to a historical Jesus by any historian or other writer of the time during and shortly after Jesus's…

— D.M. Murdock

“Moreover, it is not just that the early documents are silent about so much of Jesus that came to be recorded in the gospels,…

— George Albert Wells

The Gospels were written to present the life and teachings of Jesus in ways that would be appropriate to different readerships, and for that…

— John Drane

One would naturally expect that the Lord Jesus Christ would be sufficiently important to receive ample notice in the literature of his time, and…

— Merrill C. Tenney

I think if you place Jesus firmly in the historical context... you can make very educated hypotheses and guesses about how he lived.

— Reza Aslan

I think the evidence is just so overwhelming that Jesus existed, that it's silly to talk about him not existing. I don't know anyone…

— Bart D. Ehrman

Jesus is a mythical figure in the tradition of pagan mythology and almost nothing in all of ancient literature would lead one to believe…

— Dennis McKinsey

I'm saying that there's absolutely no conclusive evidence that Jesus ever really existed, even as a mortal. I don't believe he was a historical…

— Madalyn Murray O'Hair