Skip to content

Cold war Quote by Daniel Ellsberg

“These two systems still risk doomsday: both are still on hair-trigger alert that makes their joint existence unstable. They are susceptible to being triggered on a false alarm, a terrorist action, unauthorized launch, or a desperate decision to escalate. They would kill billions of humans, perhaps…” quote by Daniel Ellsberg
Download Open image
““These two systems still risk doomsday: both are still on hair-trigger alert that makes their joint existence unstable. They are susceptible to being triggered on a false alarm, a terrorist action, unauthorized launch, or a desperate decision to escalate. They would kill billions of humans, perhaps ending complex life on earth. This is true even though the Cold War that rationalized their existence and hair-trigger status—and their supposed necessity to national security—ended thirty years ago. Does the United States still need a Doomsday Machine? Does Russia? Did they ever? Does the existence of such a capability serve any national or international interest whatsoever to a degree that would justify its obvious danger to human life? I ask the questions not merely rhetorically. They deserve sober, reflective consideration. The answers do seem obvious, but so far as I know they have never been addressed. There follows another question: Does any nation on earth have a right to possess such a capability?””

Daniel Ellsberg

About This Quote

Source Speech: Public Lecture on Nuclear Policy, 2005

The existence of nuclear arsenals with hair‑trigger mechanisms creates an unstable, mutually assured destruction scenario that threatens billions and may lack any strategic benefit today.

In simple terms: Nuclear weapons are dangerously unstable and possibly unnecessary now.

Key Takeaway

Reevaluate and reduce nuclear arsenals.

Themes

nuclear security mutual deterrence ethical risk global stability

Mood

anxious serious

Type

political ethical

When to use this quote

  • policy debates
  • international treaties
  • national security planning
  • public education

Key Concepts

deterrence theory risk assessment international law

Questions to Reflect On

  • Should nations prioritize disarmament over perceived security?
  • How can global governance prevent accidental escalation?
A Different Perspective

Even without a false alarm, the mere presence of such weapons poses existential risk.

4.1 out of 5 (9 ratings)

More by Daniel Ellsberg

Explore all 58 Daniel Ellsberg quotes

More Cold war quotes

Browse all 906 Cold war quotes