Clear Quote by Antonin Scalia
“More importantly, the Court forgets that ours is a government of laws and not of men. That means we are governed by the terms of our laws, not by the unenacted will of our lawmakers. 'If Congress enacted into law something different from what it intended, then it should amend the statute to conform to its intent.' In the meantime, this Court 'has no roving license ... to disregard clear language simply on the view that ... Congress 'must have intended' something broader.”
About This Quote
The judiciary must enforce statutes as written, not infer broader intentions beyond clear language, preserving the rule of law over legislative discretion.
In simple terms: Statutes should be applied literally, not expanded by courts.
Legislative intent does not override explicit text.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- court reviewing ambiguous statutes
- legislators drafting new laws
- judges interpreting legacy statutes
- policy debates on judicial activism
Key Concepts
Practical Applications
- legal education on textualism
- guidance for lawmakers on drafting clarity
Questions to Reflect On
- How does strict textualism affect democratic accountability?
- When might a court justifiably deviate from literal text?
Critics argue strict textualism can ignore evolving societal needs and legislative purpose.