Art Quote by Andrei Tarkovsky
““There was a time when I thought that film, unlike other art forms (being the most democratic of them all) had a total effect, identical of every audience. That it was first and foremost a series of recorded images; that the images are photographic and unequivocal. That being so, because it appears unambiguous, it is going to be perceived in one and the same way by everyone who sees it. (Up to a certain point, obviously) But I was wrong. One has to work out a principle which allows for film to affect people individually. The 'total' image must become something private. (comparable with the images of literature, painting, poetry, music.) The basic principle- as it were, the mainspring- is, I think, that as little as possible has actually to be shown, and form that little the audience has to build up an idea of the rest, of the whole. In my view that has to be the basis for constructing the cinematographic image. And if one looks at it from the point of view of symbols, then the symbol in cinema is a symbol of nature, of reality. Off course, it isn't a question of details, but of what is hidden.””
About This Quote
Source Interview: 1975, The Film Journal, interview with Andrei Tarkovsky
Film must leave space for personal interpretation; minimal explicit detail lets viewers construct meaning themselves.
In simple terms: Film should be vague enough for personal meaning.
Show less, let audience imagine.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- film criticism
- creative writing
- teaching film studies
- directing
- screenwriting
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How can a filmmaker balance clarity with openness?
- What symbols resonate personally with you?
Too much ambiguity can confuse or alienate viewers.