The pure natural scientist is liable to forget that minds exist, and that if it were not for them he could neither know nor act on physical objects. — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
Our analysis of truth and falsehood, or of the nature of judgment, is not very likely to be influenced by our hopes and fears. — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
In Psychology we deal with minds and their processes, and leave out of account as far as possible the objects that we get to… — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
In all the sciences except Psychology we deal with objects and their changes, and leave out of account as far as possible the mind… — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
The pure natural scientist is liable to forget that minds exist, and that if it were not for them he could neither know nor… — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
Common sense says that chairs and tables exist independently of whether anyone happens to perceive them or not. — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
It is clear that every immediate object of our senses both exists and is real in the primary meaning of these terms so long… — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
It should now be clear why the method of Philosophy is so different from that of the natural sciences. Experiments are not made, because… — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
When we say that Philosophy tries to clear up the meanings of concepts we do not mean that it is simply concerned to substitute… — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
When I see a colour or hear a sound, I am aware of something, and not of nothing. — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
