In Psychology we deal with minds and their processes, and leave out of account as far as possible the objects that we get to know by means of them. — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
The pure natural scientist is liable to forget that minds exist, and that if it were not for them he could neither know nor act on physical objects. — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
Our analysis of truth and falsehood, or of the nature of judgment, is not very likely to be influenced by our hopes and fears. — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
In Psychology we deal with minds and their processes, and leave out of account as far as possible the objects that we get to… — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
In all the sciences except Psychology we deal with objects and their changes, and leave out of account as far as possible the mind… — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
The pure natural scientist is liable to forget that minds exist, and that if it were not for them he could neither know nor… — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
Common sense says that chairs and tables exist independently of whether anyone happens to perceive them or not. — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
It is clear that every immediate object of our senses both exists and is real in the primary meaning of these terms so long… — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
It should now be clear why the method of Philosophy is so different from that of the natural sciences. Experiments are not made, because… — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
When we say that Philosophy tries to clear up the meanings of concepts we do not mean that it is simply concerned to substitute… — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
When I see a colour or hear a sound, I am aware of something, and not of nothing. — Charles D. Broad Copy Share Image
