Skip to content

Why have two figures of such remarkable interest been so…

“Why have two figures of such remarkable interest been so scanted by the annalists and historians, so overlooked by philosophers, poets, and priests? I think it may be that they were, to put it bluntly, too disreputable. They were too stubbornly independent to give allegiance to a single city and…” quote by Steven Saylor
Download Open image
““Why have two figures of such remarkable interest been so scanted by the annalists and historians, so overlooked by philosophers, poets, and priests? I think it may be that they were, to put it bluntly, too disreputable. They were too stubbornly independent to give allegiance to a single city and thus become subject matter for a civic epic. They were too often involved with demons and sorcerers to appeal to the staid philosopher and too shifty to please the sober historian. In short, they were rogues, and rogues have no place in the lists of kings and demigods and heroes. It may be that no poet shall ever write of them, alas!””

Steven Saylor

About This Quote

This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.

Historical figures who defy conventional narratives are often excluded from mainstream records.

In simple terms: Outsiders are erased from history.

Key Takeaway

Seek hidden stories.

Themes

history identity outsiders mythmaking

Mood

curious inquisitive

Type

literary historical

When to use this quote

  • archaeology
  • genealogy
  • education
  • media representation

Key Concepts

historical analysis literature cultural studies

Questions to Reflect On

  • What voices are missing from our histories?
  • How can we broaden our definition of heroism?
A Different Perspective

Not all valuable contributions fit heroic archetypes.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ No ratings yet

More by Steven Saylor

Explore all 25 Steven Saylor quotes

More History quotes

Browse all 27,263 History quotes