Nor is it again that the novel has killed the play, as…
““Nor is it again that the novel has killed the play, as some critics would persuade us - the romantic movement of France shows us that. The work of Balzac and of Hugo grew up side by side together; nay, more, were complementary to each other, though neither of them saw it. While all other forms of poetry may flourish in an ignoble age, the splendid individualism of the lyrist, fed by its own passion, and lit by its own power, may pass as a pillar of fire as well across the desert as across places that are pleasant. It is none the less glorious though no man follow it - nay, by the greater sublimity of its loneliness it may be quickened into loftier utterance and intensified into clearer song.””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
The novel and play coexist, each enhancing the other; artistic forms can thrive together despite criticism.
In simple terms: Novels and plays both valuable.
Key Takeaway
Recognize complementary arts.
Themes
art
literature
collaboration
history
criticism
Mood
thoughtful
analytical
Type
critical
explanatory
When to use this quote
- studying literature
- writing
- teaching
- creative collaboration
Key Concepts
intertextuality
cultural evolution
artistic synergy
Questions to Reflect On
- Can one art form truly replace another?
- How does collaboration enrich creativity?
A Different Perspective
Some argue one form dominates the market.