How can we vote for a bill [S.744] that our own CBO says…
![“How can we vote for a bill [S.744] that our own CBO says will reduce average wages in America for 12 years, increase unemployment for 7 years, and reduce per capita GNP growth over 25 years? A bill that will admit 30 million people to permanent legal status in the next 10 years? That will…” quote by Jeff Sessions](https://sms4smile.com/q/img-quotes/ac8/jeff-sessions-2380_america_how-can-we-vote-for-a-bill-s-744-that-ou_1751150.png)
“How can we vote for a bill [S.744] that our own CBO says will reduce average wages in America for 12 years, increase unemployment for 7 years, and reduce per capita GNP growth over 25 years? A bill that will admit 30 million people to permanent legal status in the next 10 years? That will dramatically increase the annual immigration flow, and will double the guest worker flow?”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
The bill’s projected economic harms conflict with its immigration goals, raising concerns about its overall benefit.
In simple terms: The proposal may hurt the economy while expanding immigration.
Key Takeaway
Weigh economic impact against policy aims.
Themes
immigration
economics
policy
labor market
Mood
critical
skeptical
Type
political
economic
When to use this quote
- budget planning
- employment forecasting
- immigration reform debates
Key Concepts
Cost‑benefit analysis
public opinion
legislative strategy
Questions to Reflect On
- Is the trade‑off justified?
- What alternatives could achieve similar goals with less harm?
A Different Perspective
Assumes projections are accurate and ignores potential long‑term gains.