Censorship ends in logical completeness when nobody is…
![“Censorship ends in logical completeness when nobody is allowed to read any books except the books that nobody can read." [As quoted in Literary Censorship in England (in Current Opinion , Vol. 55, No. 5, November 1913)]” quote by George Bernard Shaw](https://sms4smile.com/q/img-quotes/5e8/george-bernard-shaw-68_books_censorship-ends-in-logical-completeness_2466063.png)
““Censorship ends in logical completeness when nobody is allowed to read any books except the books that nobody can read." [As quoted in Literary Censorship in England (in Current Opinion , Vol. 55, No. 5, November 1913)]””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Censorship is paradoxical when only unreadable books are permitted, making the restriction meaningless.
In simple terms: Censorship that bans unreadable books is pointless.
Key Takeaway
Recognize that over‑restricting freedom of reading defeats its purpose.
Themes
freedom of expression
paradox
literature
Mood
irry
critical
thought‑provoking
Type
philosophical
satirical
When to use this quote
- library policy
- education
- government regulation
- publishing decisions
Key Concepts
censorship
logic
accessibility
Questions to Reflect On
- What purpose does a ban on unreadable material serve?
- How does this paradox affect public trust in censorship?
A Different Perspective
If the books are truly unreadable, the ban may be symbolic rather than practical.