A prominent Chicago politician, Justin Butterfield, asked…
![“A prominent Chicago politician, Justin Butterfield, asked if he was against the Mexican War, replied: “no, I opposed one War [the War of 1812]. That was enough for me. I am now perpetually in favor of war, pestilence and famine.” quote by Doris Kearns Goodwin](https://sms4smile.com/q/i/98e/doris-kearns-goodwin-1951_politics_a-prominent-chicago-politician-justin-bu_2836884.png)
““A prominent Chicago politician, Justin Butterfield, asked if he was against the Mexican War, replied: “no, I opposed one War [the War of 1812]. That was enough for me. I am now perpetually in favor of war, pestilence and famine.””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
A politician claims perpetual support for war, pestilence, and famine, reflecting cynical militarism.
In simple terms: War support can become cynical.
Key Takeaway
Question motives behind war advocacy.
Themes
politics
military
cynicism
war
ethics
Mood
critical
skeptical
analytical
Type
political
ethical
When to use this quote
- policy debates
- public speeches
- media analysis
Key Concepts
militarism
political rhetoric
moral decay
Questions to Reflect On
- Why do some embrace war unconditionally?
- What are the ethical limits of war support?
A Different Perspective
Not all support war for profit.