To what part of electrical science are we not indebted to…
![“To what part of electrical science are we not indebted to Faraday? He has increased our knowledge of the hidden and unknown to such an extent, that all subsequent writers are compelled so frequently to mention his name and quote his papers, that the very repetition becomes monotonous. [How]…” quote by Alfred Smee](https://sms4smile.com/q/i/f02/alfred-smee-82261_acknowledge_to-what-part-of-electrical-science-are-w_1095021.jpg)
“To what part of electrical science are we not indebted to Faraday? He has increased our knowledge of the hidden and unknown to such an extent, that all subsequent writers are compelled so frequently to mention his name and quote his papers, that the very repetition becomes monotonous. [How] humiliating it may be to acknowledge so great a share of successful investigation to one man.”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Faraday's influence is so pervasive that mentioning him becomes repetitive, highlighting the challenge of giving credit without overuse.
In simple terms: Faraday is heavily cited, making references feel stale.
Key Takeaway
Acknowledge contributions without overusing names.
Themes
science
humility
recognition
Mood
reflective
academic
Type
historical
educational
When to use this quote
- academic writing
- lecture introductions
- research citations
- educational materials
Key Concepts
electromagnetism
historical impact
Questions to Reflect On
- How can we balance credit with originality?
- When does repetition become counterproductive?
A Different Perspective
Overemphasis can diminish the perceived novelty of later work.