Always Quote by Wendy Long
“We've always said a filibuster is not appropriate for judicial nominees. A filibuster is a legislative tool designed to extract compromises. A judicial nominee is a person. You can't take the arm or leg of a nominee.”
About This Quote
Source Speech: Congressional hearing, US Senate, 2005
A filibuster should not be used against judicial nominees because it is a coercive tactic unsuited to evaluating individuals.
In simple terms: Filibusters are harsh tools that don’t fit judicial appointments.
Key Takeaway
Avoid using filibusters for judges.
Themes
judicial process
legislative tactics
fairness
Mood
serious
reflective
Type
political
ethical
When to use this quote
- senate hearings
- judicial nominations
- legislative negotiations
- court appointments
Key Concepts
political strategy
judicial ethics
compromise
Questions to Reflect On
- Is a filibuster ever justified for a judicial nominee?
- How can compromise be achieved without coercion?
A Different Perspective
Filibusters may be needed to block extreme nominees, limiting their use.
![“We call on the Senate to reject any judicial nominee who does not affirm fundamental civil rights, including a woman's right [to obtain an abortion on demand]. The threat an [pro-life] judiciary poses to women's lives demands nothing less.” quote by Susana Martinez](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/34a/susana-martinez-18256_abortion_we-call-on-the-senate-to-reject-any-judi_2827123.jpg)
