Revolution Quote by Ulysses S. Grant
““This was characteristic of Mr. Stanton. He was a man who never questioned his own authority, and who always did in war time what he wanted to do. He was an able constitutional lawyer and jurist; but the Constitution was not an impediment to him while the war lasted. In this latter particular I entirely agree with the view he evidently held. The Constitution was not framed with a view to any such rebellion as that of 1861-5. While it did not authorize rebellion it made no provision against it. Yet the right to resist or suppress rebellion is as inherent as the right of self-defence, and as natural as the right of an individual to preserve his life when in jeopardy. The Constitution was therefore in abeyance for the time being, so far as it in any way affected the progress and termination of the war. Those in rebellion against the government of the United States were not restricted by constitutional provisions, or any other, except the acts of their Congress, which was loyal and devoted to the cause for which the South was then fighting. It would be a hard case when one-third of a nation, united in rebellion against the national authority, is entirely untrammeled, that the other two-thirds, in their efforts to maintain the Union intact, should be restrained by a Constitution prepared by our ancestors for the express purpose of insuring the permanency of the confederation of the States.””
About This Quote
Source Speech: Letter to Congress, 1865
Grant argues that during civil war, constitutional limits can be set aside to preserve the Union, viewing rebellion as a threat that justifies extraordinary measures.
In simple terms: Constitution can be paused in war to protect the nation.
Prioritize national unity over strict legal constraints in existential crises.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- Political leadership
- military strategy
- legal decision making
- national crisis management
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- Is it ever justified to suspend constitutional protections?
- How do we balance liberty and security in wartime?
Ignoring constitutional rights can set dangerous precedents for future abuses.