Bans Quote by Stephen Reinhardt
“Defendants' essential contention is that bans on same-sex marriage promote the welfare of children, by encouraging good parenting in stable opposite-sex families… Defendants have presented no evidence of any such effect. Indeed, they cannot even explain the manner in which, as they predict, children of opposite-sex couples will be harmed. Their other contentions are equally without merit.”
About This Quote
Source Court Opinion: United States Supreme Court, 2013
The argument claims same‑sex marriage bans benefit children, but provides no supporting evidence and cannot explain alleged harms.
In simple terms: Claims lack evidence and logic.
Key Takeaway
Question unsupported claims.
Themes
law
evidence
family policy
Mood
skeptical
critical
Type
legal
analytical
When to use this quote
- legal briefs
- policy debates
- court hearings
Key Concepts
constitutional law
social science
policy analysis
Questions to Reflect On
- How can policymakers justify laws without evidence?
- What evidence would be needed to support such claims?
A Different Perspective
The argument assumes benefits without data, ignoring research showing no harm.
![“Ben Carson also denounced [Donald] Trump's ban all Muslims proposal saying we do not and would not advocate being selective on one's religion.” quote by Rachel Maddow](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/0d7/rachel-maddow-1240_bans_ben-carson-also-denounced-donald-trump-s_674.jpg)
![“When observers look back 50 years from now, the arguments supporting Florida's ban on same-sex marriage, though just as sincerely held [as views of those who were opposed to interracial marriage], will again seem an obvious pretext for discrimination.” quote by Robert Lewis Hinkle](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/b38/robert-lewis-hinkle-98058_argument_when-observers-look-back-50-years-from-n_108007.jpg)
