Abuse of power Quote by Sebastian Junger
““The state's case against Smith, however, did claim to speak to his actual guilt or innocence, and it has to be considered carefully. The reason this is important has nothing to do with Roy Smith or Bessie Goldberg or even Al DeSalvo; they're all dead. In some ways there is nothing less relevant than an old murder case. The reason it is important is this: Here is a group of people who have gathered to judge--and possibly execute--a fellow citizen. It's the highest calling there is, the very thing that separates us from social anarchy, and it has to be done well. A trial, however, is just a microcosm of the entire political system. When a democratic government decides to raise taxes or wage war or write child safety laws, it is essentially saying to an enormous jury, "This is our theory of how the world works, and this is our proposal for dealing with it. If our theory makes sense to you, vote for us in the next election. If it doesn't, throw us out." The ability of citizens to scrutinize the theories insisted on by their government is their only protection against abuse of power and, ultimately, against tyranny. If ordinary citizens can't coolly and rationally evaluate a prosecutor's summation in a criminal trial, they won't have a chance at calling to task a deceitful government. And all governments are deceitful--they're deceitful because it's easier than being honest. Most of the time, it's no more sinister than that.””
About This Quote
Source Speech: The Case for Civic Vigilance, Sebastian Junger, 2015
Citizens must critically evaluate legal and political arguments to protect democracy from abuse and tyranny.
In simple terms: People need to judge government actions carefully.
Stay skeptical and demand evidence.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- jury duty
- voting
- public hearings
- media consumption
- community forums
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How can ordinary people become better judges of political claims?
- What safeguards can improve public understanding of legal proceedings?
Citizens often lack the time or expertise to deeply analyze complex policies.