Skip to content

Argument Quote by Phillip E. Johnson

“I approach the creation-evolution dispute not as a scientist but as a problem of law, which means among other things that I know something about the ways that words are used in arguments. What first drew my attention to the question was the way the rules of argument seemed to be structured to make…” quote by Phillip E. Johnson
Download Open image
““I approach the creation-evolution dispute not as a scientist but as a problem of law, which means among other things that I know something about the ways that words are used in arguments. What first drew my attention to the question was the way the rules of argument seemed to be structured to make it impossible to question whether what we are being told about evolution is really true. For example, the Academy's rule against negative argument automatically eliminates the possibility that science has not discovered how complex organisms could have developed. However wrong the current answer may be, it stands until a better answer arrives. It is as if a criminal defendant were not allowed to present an alibi unless he could also show who did commit the crime.””

Phillip E. Johnson

About This Quote

Source Book: Darwin on Trial by Phillip E. Johnson, 1991

He frames the evolution debate as a legal argument, highlighting procedural rules that limit questioning and favor prevailing theories.

In simple terms: Evolution is treated like a courtroom case with strict rules.

Key Takeaway

Question the rules that limit scientific debate.

Themes

science law argumentation skepticism methodology

Mood

skeptical analytical

Type

intellectual inquisitive

When to use this quote

  • academic discussions
  • public policy
  • education
  • media coverage
  • legal challenges

Key Concepts

philosophy of science critical thinking legal metaphor

Questions to Reflect On

  • What assumptions are built into scientific standards?
  • How can we ensure open inquiry without undermining rigor?
A Different Perspective

The analogy may oversimplify scientific methodology and ignore empirical evidence.

2.4 out of 5 (4 ratings)

More by Phillip E. Johnson

Explore all 45 Phillip E. Johnson quotes

More Argument quotes

Browse all 3,479 Argument quotes