Argument Quote by Phillip E. Johnson
““I approach the creation-evolution dispute not as a scientist but as a problem of law, which means among other things that I know something about the ways that words are used in arguments. What first drew my attention to the question was the way the rules of argument seemed to be structured to make it impossible to question whether what we are being told about evolution is really true. For example, the Academy's rule against negative argument automatically eliminates the possibility that science has not discovered how complex organisms could have developed. However wrong the current answer may be, it stands until a better answer arrives. It is as if a criminal defendant were not allowed to present an alibi unless he could also show who did commit the crime.””
About This Quote
Source Book: Darwin on Trial by Phillip E. Johnson, 1991
He frames the evolution debate as a legal argument, highlighting procedural rules that limit questioning and favor prevailing theories.
In simple terms: Evolution is treated like a courtroom case with strict rules.
Question the rules that limit scientific debate.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- academic discussions
- public policy
- education
- media coverage
- legal challenges
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- What assumptions are built into scientific standards?
- How can we ensure open inquiry without undermining rigor?
The analogy may oversimplify scientific methodology and ignore empirical evidence.