Skip to content

Asceticism Quote by Peter Sloterdijk

“In the monotheistic age, God was viewed as the one who causes and does everything, and hence humans were not entitled to make something, let alone a great deal, of themselves. In humanistic epochs, by contrast, man is considered the being responsible for causing and doing everything - but…” quote by Peter Sloterdijk
Download Open image
““In the monotheistic age, God was viewed as the one who causes and does everything, and hence humans were not entitled to make something, let alone a great deal, of themselves. In humanistic epochs, by contrast, man is considered the being responsible for causing and doing everything - but consequently no longer has the right to make little or nothing of himself. Whether people now make nothing or much of themselves, they commit - according to traditional forms of logic - an inexplicable and unpardonable error. There is always a surplus of differences that cannot be integrated into any of the prescribed systems of life-interpretation. In a world that belongs to God, human beings make too much of themselves as soon as they raise their heads; in a world that belongs to humans, they repeatedly make too little of themselves. The possibility that the inequality between humans might be due to their asceticisms, their different stances towards the challenges of the practising life - this idea has never been formulated in the history of investigations into the ultimate causes of difference between humans. If one follows this trail, it opens up perspectives that, being unthought-of, are literally unheard-of.””

Peter Sloterdijk

About This Quote

Source Book: Critique of Cynical Reason, Peter Sloterdijk, 1983

Humans oscillate between over‑valuing and under‑valuing themselves, leading to a persistent existential error that cannot be fully resolved by existing belief systems.

In simple terms: We swing between too much and too little self‑importance, creating a paradox.

Key Takeaway

Recognize and balance self‑esteem without extremes.

Themes

existentialism humanism self‑worth philosophy

Mood

reflective critical thoughtful

Type

philosophical inspirational

When to use this quote

  • personal development
  • spiritual counseling
  • educational curricula
  • public discourse

Key Concepts

ontological paradox identity meaning

Questions to Reflect On

  • How can societies foster healthy self‑valuation?
  • What practices help individuals avoid both arrogance and self‑denial?
A Different Perspective

Balancing self‑esteem is difficult in cultures that reward extremes.

2.3 out of 5 (9 ratings)

More by Peter Sloterdijk

Explore all 71 Peter Sloterdijk quotes

More Asceticism quotes

Browse all 113 Asceticism quotes