Bad Quote by Michael Shellenberger
“Nations are reorienting toward the national interest and away from Malthusianism and neoliberalism, which is good for nuclear and bad for renewables. The evidence is overwhelming that our high-energy civilization is better for people and nature than the low-energy civilization that climate alarmists would return us to.”
About This Quote
The quote argues that shifting focus to national interests and away from Malthusian and neoliberal ideas benefits nuclear power but harms renewable energy, claiming high-energy societies better support people and nature than low-energy ones proposed by climate activists.
In simple terms: High-energy societies are preferable to low-energy ones.
Key Takeaway
Energy intensity impacts welfare and environment.
Themes
energy policy
national interest
climate debate
renewables vs nuclear
economic growth
Mood
assertive
controversial
optimistic
Type
opinion
policy critique
visionary
When to use this quote
- government energy planning
- investment decisions
- public discourse on climate
- energy security assessments
Key Concepts
energy transition
environmental trade-offs
political ideology
Practical Applications
- policy formulation
- strategic energy portfolio planning
Questions to Reflect On
- What evidence supports high-energy societies' benefits?
- How might renewable growth be integrated without compromising national interests?
![“EROEI [energy returned on energy invested, or net energy] is to a civilization what gross profit is to a business, the source of the surplus that supports the entire enterprise.” quote by John Michael Greer](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/9b6/john-michael-greer-28078_business_eroei-energy-returned-on-energy-invested_1034993.jpg)
