Skip to content

Indians Quote by Mark Edwin Miller

“A host of scholars – many of whom, like Deloria, have aided petitioning tribes – support the ‘small pie’ theory. They believe that government definitions of Indians and tribes are simply part of the old colonial order, set to ‘divide and conquer’ Native peoples. These scholars see these government…” quote by Mark Edwin Miller
Download Open image
““A host of scholars – many of whom, like Deloria, have aided petitioning tribes – support the ‘small pie’ theory. They believe that government definitions of Indians and tribes are simply part of the old colonial order, set to ‘divide and conquer’ Native peoples. These scholars see these government definitions as overreliant on nonindigenous models of tribalism, blood quantum, government rolls and censuses. Many of them call upon tribes and Native peoples to undertake decolonization projects, imploring Indian leaders to pursue a new acknowledgment agenda, on that is more inclusive and less based on national imperatives and Western epistemologies of race, history, empiricism, and science. The most accepted scholarly position, which has been called the ‘liberal-inclusive’ model for identifying tribes and Indian individuals, implies that the vast majority of unrecognized Indian groups and individuals are worthy of acknowledgment. This acknowledgment is not forthcoming, they say, due to a host of factors, including federal neglect, inadequate Euro-American recordkeeping, racism, and opposition from established tribes. Scholars who take this position find it shameful that marginal, unacknowledged aboriginal peoples are languishing today. Certain individuals within this loosely defined ideological school argue that officials should rely not on the current restrictive policy, but upon self-identification, community acceptance, and state recognition.””

Mark Edwin Miller

About This Quote

Source Article: “Indigenous Sovereignty and the Small Pie Theory” by Mark Edwin Miller, 2020

Scholars argue that current U.S. tribal definitions are colonial tools that exclude many Native groups, urging a shift to self‑identification and community acceptance for more inclusive recognition.

In simple terms: Current definitions exclude many Native groups; scholars want self‑identification based inclusion.

Key Takeaway

Advocate policies that recognize tribes through self‑identification and community acceptance.

Themes

indigenous rights colonialism recognition self‑identification decolonization

Mood

reflective determined

Type

analytical advocacy

When to use this quote

  • tribal recognition processes
  • policy reform
  • community building
  • legal advocacy
  • academic research

Key Concepts

political theory legal frameworks identity politics

Questions to Reflect On

  • How can self‑identification be balanced with existing legal structures?
  • What safeguards prevent misuse of community acceptance?
A Different Perspective

Implementation may face resistance from established tribes and bureaucratic inertia.

2.8 out of 5 (9 ratings)

More by Mark Edwin Miller

Explore all 9 Mark Edwin Miller quotes

More Indians quotes

Browse all 549 Indians quotes