Adverse Quote by Lance B. Wickman
“Some people promote the idea that there can be two marriages, co-existing side by side, one heterosexual and one homosexual, without any adverse consequences. The hard reality is that, as an institution, marriage like all other institutions can only have one definition without changing the very character of the institution. Hence there can be no coexistence of two marriages.”
About This Quote
Argues that marriage, as an institution, must have a single definition, making simultaneous heterosexual and homosexual marriages untenable.
In simple terms: Marriage needs one definition; dual definitions conflict.
Key Takeaway
Recognize institutional limits on definitions.
Themes
marriage
institution
definition
social norms
conflict
Mood
thoughtful
analytical
Type
philosophical
controversial
When to use this quote
- policy debate
- family law
- social activism
- religious discourse
Key Concepts
legal
sociological
ethical
Questions to Reflect On
- Can institutions adapt without losing identity?
- What are the benefits of inclusive definitions?
A Different Perspective
The view may ignore evolving cultural contexts and legal adaptations.
![“While it may be true that allowing single-sex unions will not immediately and directly affect all existing marriages, the real question is how it will affect society as a whole over time, including the rising generation and future generations. ["The Divine Institution of Marriage," August 13, 2008]” quote by LDS Church](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/1da/lds-church-47854_marriage_while-it-may-be-true-that-allowing-singl_265106.jpg)
![“[Genderless marriage] is contrary to God's law, to revealed Word. Scripture, ancient and modern, could not be clearer on the definition that the Lord and His agents have given to marriage down through the dispensations.” quote by Lance B. Wickman](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/05a/lance-b-wickman-15289_agents_genderless-marriage-is-contrary-to-god-s_467791.jpg)
