Analogies Quote by Kim Stanley Robinson
““But no. That was analogy rather than homology. What in the humanities they would call a heroic simile, if he understood the term, or a metaphor, or some other kind of literary analogy. And analogies were mostly meaningless — a matter of phenotype rather than genotype (to use another analogy). Most, of poetry and literature, really all the humanities, not to mention the social sciences, were phenotypic as far as Sax could tell. They added up to a huge compendium of meaningless analogies, which did not help to explain things, but only distorted perception of them. A kind of continuous conceptual drunkenness, one might say. Sax himself much preferred exactitude and explanatory power, and why not? If it was 200 Kelvin outside why not say so, rather than talk about witches’ tits and the like, hauling the whole great baggage of the ignorant past along to obscure every encounter with sensory reality? It was absurd.””
About This Quote
Source Essay: The Death of the Novel, Kim Stanley Robinson, 2009
The passage argues that many analogies in humanities are superficial, focusing on appearance rather than underlying truth, leading to confusion rather than clarity.
In simple terms: Analogies often hide deeper meaning and can mislead.
Prioritize precise, evidence‑based explanations.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- academic writing
- teaching
- public discourse
- media analysis
- personal reflection
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- When do analogies illuminate versus obscure?
- How can we balance precision with imagination?
May dismiss valuable metaphorical insight, undervaluing creative thought.