““But suppose they are correct. Suppose we grant that there is always some good when individuals—even Bardwell—harmonize their actions with their moral convictions. My main difference with Anderson and Girgis concerns what happens next. For even if it is good for Bardwell to achieve such harmony, it does not follow that the rest of us should make it easy for him to do so. The blurring of this distinction—between what the religious claimant should do and what everyone else should do—is a pervasive problem in their discussion. The””
