Skip to content

Books Quote by Ibram X. Kendi

“English physician Charles White, the well-known author of a treatise on midwifery, entered the debate over species in 1799. Unlike Scotland’s Lord Kames, White circled around religion and employed a new method of proving the existence of separate race species—comparative anatomy. He did not want…” quote by Ibram X. Kendi
Download Open image
““English physician Charles White, the well-known author of a treatise on midwifery, entered the debate over species in 1799. Unlike Scotland’s Lord Kames, White circled around religion and employed a new method of proving the existence of separate race species—comparative anatomy. He did not want the conclusions in his Account on the Regular Gradation in Man to “be construed so as to give the smallest countenance to the pernicious practice of enslaving mankind.” His only objective was “to investigate the truth.” White disputed Buffon’s legendary contention that since interracial unions were fertile, the races had to be of the same species. Actually, orangutans had been “known to carry off negro-boys, girls, and even women,” he said, sometimes enslaving them for “brutal passion.” On the natural scale, Europeans were the highest and Africans the lowest, approaching “nearer to the brute creation than any other of the human species.” Blacks were superior in areas where apes were superior to humans—seeing, hearing, smelling, memorizing things, and chewing food. “The PENIS of an African is larger than that of an European,” White told his readers. Most anatomical museums in Europe preserved Black penises, and, he noted, “I have one in mine.””

Ibram X. Kendi

About This Quote

Source Historical: 1799 Debate on Species, Charles White's writings

White used comparative anatomy to argue racial differences, supporting slavery while claiming scientific objectivity

In simple terms: He claimed scientific evidence for racial hierarchy to justify slavery

Key Takeaway

Question scientific claims used to support oppression

Themes

science racism history ethics colonialism

Mood

critical reflective

Type

historical ethical

When to use this quote

  • academic discussion
  • historical analysis
  • education on racism

Key Concepts

biological determinism racial hierarchy scientific racism

Questions to Reflect On

  • How do we separate science from prejudice?
  • What responsibilities do scientists have?
A Different Perspective

Scientific arguments can be biased by social motives

3.5 out of 5 (8 ratings)

More by Ibram X. Kendi

Explore all 140 Ibram X. Kendi quotes

More Books quotes

Browse all 59,485 Books quotes