“Perhaps - and this goes for the Kyoto School too - one of these insights is that nothingness and unknowing don't have to be equated with a destructive nihilism but with the experience of unity and participation - whilst resisting the tendency of objectifying metaphysics to claim that we can in some way 'know' that this experienced unity is really the truth of how things are, i.e., reveals being itself.”
![“Natura nihil agit frustra [Nature does nothing in vain] is the only indisputible axiom in philosophy. There are no grotesques in nature; not any thing framed to fill up empty cantons, and unncecessary spaces.” quote by Thomas Browne](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/938/thomas-browne-2006_axioms_natura-nihil-agit-frustra-nature-does-no_2064594.jpg)
![“I think he [Heidegger] sets the question up in a useful way and, despite appearances, he's not 'against' technology. He just wants us to have a questioning and thoughtful relation to it. This must be relevant to any approach.” quote by George Pattison](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/8b4/george-pattison-17005_appearance_i-think-he-heidegger-sets-the-question-u_438353.jpg)
![“But, inevitably, as he [Kierkegaard] approaches what we might call his Christocentric climax many readers drop off. Many scholars just leave that part of his authorship alone.” quote by George Pattison](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/44a/george-pattison-17005_approach_but-inevitably-as-he-kierkegaard-approac_610234.jpg)
