Appeals Quote by Fred Hoyle
“On scientific grounds this big bang assumption is much less the palatable of the two. For it is an irrational process that cannot be described in scientific terms. . . . On philosophical grounds too I cannot see any good reason for preferring the big bang idea. Indeed it seems to me in the philosophical sense to be a distinctly unsatisfactory notion, since it puts the basic assumption out of sight where it can never be challenged by a direct appeal to observation.”
About This Quote
Source Lecture: 1950s lectures on cosmology, presented at Royal Institution
The Big Bang is philosophically unsatisfactory because it posits an unobservable origin, making it untestable
In simple terms: Big Bang lacks observable start point
Question unobservable origins critically
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- academic debate
- public science communication
- educational curricula
- research funding decisions
- philosophical inquiry
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- What evidence would make the Big Bang more philosophically acceptable?
- Can a theory be valid without direct observation?
Alternative models like steady state offer testable predictions